| 1 |
________________ |
| 2 |
Yury German |
| 3 |
Gentoo Security Team | Planet Gentoo | Gentoo Infrastructure |
| 4 |
Email: blueknight@g.o |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
GPG Fingerprint: 8858 89D6 C0C4 75C4 D0DD FA00 EEAF ED89 024C 043 |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 6:32 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> On pią, 2017-07-21 at 23:07 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 11 |
>>> If you have any ideas how to improve the page even more, possibly |
| 12 |
>>> classify the needs better, your comments will also be most welcome. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Make (part of) the the requirements more clear and semi-formal. E.g., have a |
| 16 |
>> switch "not required / soft requirement / hard requirement", which maybe |
| 17 |
>> changes table sorting: |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> * Must be Gentoo dev? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Kinda makes sense. I wonder if we should also have a special category |
| 22 |
> for proxied maintainers there. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
There is more then Proxy Maintainers. There are also positions within Security that do not require Dev Access |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> * (what else?) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I was thinking of some kind of 'topic'. Like, some jobs involve package |
| 31 |
> maintenance, some just testing, and some upstream code development. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Maybe it'd be worth to consider it as some kind of tag/keyword system. |
| 34 |
> Otherwise, I feel like soon enough it's going to have 10 questions or so |
| 35 |
> ;-). |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> The table is a bit silly in the sense that part of it addresses devs, part |
| 39 |
>> not... |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> -- |
| 42 |
> Best regards, |
| 43 |
> Michał Górny |
Archives