| 1 |
On Sat, 10 May 2014 13:43:04 +0000 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Exactly, they should rather be the guys who jump in discussions that |
| 5 |
> affect tree consistency etc. and help with general inquiries. Instead, |
| 6 |
> they point me to dev-ML and... council. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Do you mean when you ask 'What is the opinion of the QA team on this?' |
| 9 |
but then later just ignore us and take it to the Gentoo Council? (GTK+) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Or a 'Does QA feel this should be treated with more "force"? Seems no |
| 12 |
one is really interested in fixing any of these bugs.' in an attempt |
| 13 |
to change the 'more or less' community consensus? (Hacked .pc files) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Or the 'giant snowflake' where addressing those related would suffice? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Can you please reconsider to talk to them / gentoo-dev ML before us? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm confused as to why you expect a different response from us... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> As I said... I have done a lot of inquiries to QA, both regarding the |
| 22 |
> new and the old team. It hasn't improved, you know? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It has become worse, in a good way. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
With kind regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 30 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives