1 |
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:02:02 +0200 |
2 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> * package.mask, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force |
4 |
> and package.use.mask directories |
5 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282296 |
6 |
|
7 |
> * make.defaults, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force |
8 |
> and package.use.mask in ${repository_path}/profiles |
9 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414817 |
10 |
|
11 |
These two need a profiles EAPI bump, and we've not discussed what |
12 |
happens when profiles go over EAPI 1 yet. |
13 |
|
14 |
> * REPOSITORY variable |
15 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414813 |
16 |
> |
17 |
> * Repository dependencies |
18 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414815 |
19 |
|
20 |
These two are widely considered undesirable. The second one also has a |
21 |
rather large "we don't agree on what it means, but whatever it means |
22 |
it isn't want you naively want" issue. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Ciaran McCreesh |