Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:04:22
Message-Id: 20120814102430.261446bc@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 14 August 2012, 19:00 UTC by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:02:02 +0200
2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > * package.mask, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force
4 > and package.use.mask directories
5 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282296
6
7 > * make.defaults, use.force, use.mask, package.use, package.use.force
8 > and package.use.mask in ${repository_path}/profiles
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414817
10
11 These two need a profiles EAPI bump, and we've not discussed what
12 happens when profiles go over EAPI 1 yet.
13
14 > * REPOSITORY variable
15 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414813
16 >
17 > * Repository dependencies
18 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414815
19
20 These two are widely considered undesirable. The second one also has a
21 rather large "we don't agree on what it means, but whatever it means
22 it isn't want you naively want" issue.
23
24 --
25 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature