1 |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 1:26 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> My opinion though is we should give the trustees time to catch up |
4 |
> |
5 |
|
6 |
How much time? We're 14 years in, and Robin has been working on the |
7 |
books for a few years I think. Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the |
8 |
work he is doing, but I'm not convinced it is a one-person project, |
9 |
and it doesn't end when the past is caught up. |
10 |
|
11 |
> |
12 |
> Once that happens, I think it is better to work with them to choose the |
13 |
> future path since they own the Gentoo trademark, name, logo etc [1]. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
Working with somebody isn't the same as deferring everything to them. |
17 |
|
18 |
The problem with leaving the fate of the Foundation entirely to the |
19 |
Trustees is that there is a lot of selection bias at work. Trustees |
20 |
are a bunch of individuals selected for their interest in running a |
21 |
non-profit (for the most part, simply volunteering for the post is |
22 |
sufficient to be voted in). Should we be surprised when they advocate |
23 |
for continuing to run a non-profit? |
24 |
|
25 |
There is also no need to wait for the Foundation to fix everything |
26 |
before working on a path forward. Just as individuals can use their |
27 |
own property to work on Gentoo-related projects, or donate their own |
28 |
money to the Gentoo Foundation, so other entities can use their own |
29 |
property to work on Gentoo-related projects, or donate their money to |
30 |
the Foundation. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Rich |