1 |
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 5:50 PM Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 2020-07-18 Sat 01:00, Alec Warner wrote: |
4 |
> > So I think we can, somewhat, get away from this framing. Just get the |
5 |
> > community to pitch N projects and rank them. Offhand I can think of a |
6 |
> few: |
7 |
> > - Replace portage with pkgcore. |
8 |
> > - pkgcore maintainer (replace radhermit; who has been asking for help |
9 |
> for |
10 |
> > months) |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
Ah sorry about that. Replace, is not what I meant. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
> > - Replace repoman with pkgcheck. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Giving some perspective on the pkgcore/pkgcheck side of things, I'm not |
19 |
> sure most people realize how much work, for example, replacing portage |
20 |
> with pkgcore would entail. For a niche project within a niche OS, the |
21 |
> interested base of users is a few orders of magnitude too small to move |
22 |
> the needle much through generic crowdfunding. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> In the past, pkgcore did have a patreon account since an interested user |
25 |
> kept poking me until I set it up. I think it peaked around a handful of |
26 |
> patrons and dwindled to nothing until I closed it earlier this year. |
27 |
> While I thank all those who contributed for their interest/generosity, |
28 |
> to put the stats bluntly, I think it garnered less than a person around |
29 |
> my level could make in a day's work across 3 years. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> From my experience in software development, the most feasible method of |
32 |
> getting higher levels of work done in open source generally requires a |
33 |
> company hiring/contracting known project contributors to work on things. |
34 |
> For rewrite projects like pkgcore, it can be incredibly difficult to |
35 |
> convince entrenched interests that funding some core replacement will |
36 |
> turn out as anything more than an expensive, time-consuming moonshot. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> For myself personally wrt pkgcore/pkgcheck, I'm somewhat open to |
39 |
> third-party funding for specific work. To be honest, I don't see much of |
40 |
> a future for the project under the current development scheme so more |
41 |
> quantified external support might help spur more interest. |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
I appreciate your transparency on your own efforts in crowdfunding. |
45 |
|
46 |
-A |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
> |
50 |
> Tim |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |