Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Fundraising for incremental service level
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:44:58
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr_hmHC911cBBJue7j4hM+D3SRQoW5Cs3_CypbEMdV2qCg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Fundraising for incremental service level by Tim Harder
1 On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 5:50 PM Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > On 2020-07-18 Sat 01:00, Alec Warner wrote:
4 > > So I think we can, somewhat, get away from this framing. Just get the
5 > > community to pitch N projects and rank them. Offhand I can think of a
6 > few:
7 > > - Replace portage with pkgcore.
8 > > - pkgcore maintainer (replace radhermit; who has been asking for help
9 > for
10 > > months)
11 >
12
13 Ah sorry about that. Replace, is not what I meant.
14
15
16 > > - Replace repoman with pkgcheck.
17 >
18 > Giving some perspective on the pkgcore/pkgcheck side of things, I'm not
19 > sure most people realize how much work, for example, replacing portage
20 > with pkgcore would entail. For a niche project within a niche OS, the
21 > interested base of users is a few orders of magnitude too small to move
22 > the needle much through generic crowdfunding.
23 >
24 > In the past, pkgcore did have a patreon account since an interested user
25 > kept poking me until I set it up. I think it peaked around a handful of
26 > patrons and dwindled to nothing until I closed it earlier this year.
27 > While I thank all those who contributed for their interest/generosity,
28 > to put the stats bluntly, I think it garnered less than a person around
29 > my level could make in a day's work across 3 years.
30 >
31 > From my experience in software development, the most feasible method of
32 > getting higher levels of work done in open source generally requires a
33 > company hiring/contracting known project contributors to work on things.
34 > For rewrite projects like pkgcore, it can be incredibly difficult to
35 > convince entrenched interests that funding some core replacement will
36 > turn out as anything more than an expensive, time-consuming moonshot.
37 >
38 > For myself personally wrt pkgcore/pkgcheck, I'm somewhat open to
39 > third-party funding for specific work. To be honest, I don't see much of
40 > a future for the project under the current development scheme so more
41 > quantified external support might help spur more interest.
42 >
43
44 I appreciate your transparency on your own efforts in crowdfunding.
45
46 -A
47
48
49 >
50 > Tim
51 >
52 >