Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o, Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: What should the default acceptable licenses be?
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:52:55
Message-Id: 7a933b09-7ab3-3c3a-d39d-4c45fef88a73@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: What should the default acceptable licenses be? by Thomas Deutschmann
1 On 2/13/19 10:34 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
2 > On 2019-02-12 20:40, Alec Warner wrote:
3 >> This is why I continue to advocate for a deliberate choice based on
4 >> the social contract ("Gentoo is and will remain Free and thus the
5 >> default should be "-* @FREE" rather than some kind of objective
6 >> choice based on 'consequences'; which I think just muddle the point.
7 > Sorry, I don't get this. You understand that a change from
8 >
9
10 I understand it more as a point about how we present the change; and I
11 agree, it is more clear to just refer to social contract and no other
12 rationale or description.
13
14 --
15 Kristian Fiskerstrand
16 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
17 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature