1 |
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:31:21 +0000 M. J. Everitt wrote: |
2 |
> On 15/11/18 18:50, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:50:52PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> >> | * Notice identifies the copyright owner at the time the work was first |
5 |
> >> | published for parties seeking permission to use the work. |
6 |
> >> | * Notice identifies the year of first publication, which may be used |
7 |
> >> | to determine the term of copyright protection in the case of an |
8 |
> >> | anonymous work, a pseudonymous work, or a work made for hire. |
9 |
> >> | * Notice may prevent the work from becoming an orphan work by |
10 |
> >> | identifying the copyright owner and specifying the term of the |
11 |
> >> | copyright. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> For "indentifying the copyright owner" nothing short of a complete list |
14 |
> >> will suffice. Especially, a notice like the following (which mentions |
15 |
> >> only "Gentoo Authors" and "Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.") does |
16 |
> >> not help with that at all (i.e., it is no better than the simplified |
17 |
> >> notice): |
18 |
> >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-cluster/ceph/ceph-13.2.2-r2.ebuild?id=5f77c21f23bf1c4cfb9e68be7aa27669c8146e8e#n1 |
19 |
> > Remember that in the US, SIE is a legal entity, so it can hold |
20 |
> > copyrights, just like a person can. It is like "Gentoo Foundation, Inc." |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > So, there would be two contributors in that ebuild: "Gentoo Authors" |
23 |
> > and SIE. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> >> Besides, these last three items are pretty much moot for a work released |
26 |
> >> under the GPL-2 (which grants "permission to use"), and I think that |
27 |
> >> even you aren't suggesting that we should go for a complete list of |
28 |
> >> contributors. |
29 |
> > You are right, I'm not advocating for a complete list of contributors. |
30 |
> > I'm just advocating for flexability where contributors want it, and SIE |
31 |
> > is one of those contributors that wants it. |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > William |
34 |
> Could we not simply move copyright notices into the metadata.xml, and not |
35 |
> worry about the ebuild text itself?! |
36 |
|
37 |
No, because Gentoo is used worldwide. Just for example: in Russia |
38 |
file without copyright notices is considered proprietary (not |
39 |
public domain! project wide license may help though in some cases) |
40 |
and removal of copyright notices without author's agreement is a |
41 |
felony except for court decision or expiration reasons. |
42 |
|
43 |
Best regards, |
44 |
Andrew Savchenko |