| 1 |
On 04.04.2019 10:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2019, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 03.04.2019 17:56, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> We assume good faith and therefore don't require proof of contributors' |
| 5 |
>> And that is why we have the policy that accepts everything that does |
| 6 |
>> not look like an invalid name? Say, if np-hardass will change his |
| 7 |
>> identity to "John Smith" (I took a random now), will this be ok as |
| 8 |
>> per the policy? |
| 9 |
> Obviously not, because we know that "John Smith" is not his real name. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Why not? He can claim he has changed his name, and by the "good faith" |
| 12 |
you should trust him, or is this selective now? |
| 13 |
Even more, we know his name only because he had submitted his identity |
| 14 |
to the trustees before. |
| 15 |
People can also create virtuals with different names pretending they are |
| 16 |
real. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
This now works as described in "shut the stable door when the steed is |
| 19 |
stolen" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The glep allows any level of absurd, while this should not. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
>> Good illusion of being legal. |
| 24 |
> It boils down to "due diligence" from our side. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Ulrich |
Archives