1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hello Rich, |
5 |
|
6 |
out of curiosity: The (old or new) CoC is not to blame, the proctors |
7 |
were not to blame (you wrote that in another email in this thread) and, |
8 |
so, basically all you want to change is |
9 |
|
10 |
> updat[ing] the enforcement section to point to Comrel instead of |
11 |
> Proctors [...] |
12 |
|
13 |
If that's so, you're exchanging people (who were not to blame in the |
14 |
first place) and expect what exactly to, uh, change? |
15 |
|
16 |
Or to pose the question differently: Why will this attempt succeed |
17 |
where the first one failed? |
18 |
|
19 |
- -- |
20 |
Best regards, Wulf |
21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) |
23 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
24 |
|
25 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlJKtvcACgkQnuVXRcSi+5puSgCgxxO50zx2nXvElxmdHIFvfmOL |
26 |
JGoAoMJm+yH5Evu1RMzegmAAjHS48PE3 |
27 |
=kxmO |
28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |