Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Wulf C. Krueger" <wk@×××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:50:35
Message-Id: 524AB6F7.1000104@mailstation.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct (was: Council meeting: Tuesday 2013-10-08, 19:00 UTC) by Rich Freeman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hello Rich,
5
6 out of curiosity: The (old or new) CoC is not to blame, the proctors
7 were not to blame (you wrote that in another email in this thread) and,
8 so, basically all you want to change is
9
10 > updat[ing] the enforcement section to point to Comrel instead of
11 > Proctors [...]
12
13 If that's so, you're exchanging people (who were not to blame in the
14 first place) and expect what exactly to, uh, change?
15
16 Or to pose the question differently: Why will this attempt succeed
17 where the first one failed?
18
19 - --
20 Best regards, Wulf
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
23 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
24
25 iEYEARECAAYFAlJKtvcACgkQnuVXRcSi+5puSgCgxxO50zx2nXvElxmdHIFvfmOL
26 JGoAoMJm+yH5Evu1RMzegmAAjHS48PE3
27 =kxmO
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>