1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Andreas K Huettel wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As discussed on IRC, regarding the CC license version "3.0 or later for |
4 |
> existing projects, 4.0 or later for new projects" sounds like a good plan. |
5 |
|
6 |
I've updated item b) in the Licensing section: |
7 |
|
8 |
a) The GNU General Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2+) |
9 |
[#GPL-2]_. |
10 |
|
11 |
-b) The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License |
12 |
- (CC-BY-SA-3.0, only for documentation) [#CC-BY-SA-3.0]_. |
13 |
- *[Note: or version 4.0, to be decided]* |
14 |
+b) The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License |
15 |
+ (CC-BY-SA-4.0, only for documentation) [#CC-BY-SA-4.0]_. |
16 |
+ Existing projects may also stay with CC-BY-SA-3.0 [#CC-BY-SA-3.0]_. |
17 |
|
18 |
c) A license approved as GPL compatible by the Free Software |
19 |
Foundation [#GPL-COMPAT]_. |