1 |
On 16/02/2011 17:50, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> Currently the recruiting team handles returning developers in the same |
3 |
> way as people joining the first time. The question that I have been |
4 |
> presented with is if they should get priority? The reasoning being that |
5 |
> in their case it's more about making sure their skills are updated than |
6 |
> making sure they won't cause problems etc. Ideally of course we could |
7 |
> process everyone quickly enough that this wouldn't be a problem but |
8 |
> history has proved this to be challenging to say the least. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Regards, |
11 |
> Petteri |
12 |
> |
13 |
New comer point of view : I would have found this rather normal that a |
14 |
returning dev would bypass my application as he should consume less time |
15 |
in the recruitment process and be more quickly operational than me once |
16 |
he's been integrated back. From what I've seen so far, there's not so |
17 |
many of them anyway so this shouldn't change much the wait. |
18 |
|
19 |
In my point of view there is no drawback to getting willing and capable |
20 |
devs back home so they can help asap. It would be a good process to |
21 |
preserve an overall efficiency of both the Gentoo recruitment and |
22 |
development. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Ultrabug |
26 |
Gentoo / cluster |