| 1 |
> Yes, I am dissatisfied. I am especially dissatisfied by the absurd |
| 2 |
> bureaucracy and unclear jurisdiction. I've seen QA claiming we don't |
| 3 |
> have authority and sending me to ComRel, and being sent back to QA |
| 4 |
> because 'it's QA business'. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I would like to support that this needs clarification. We have seen too many |
| 7 |
things bounced back and forth between qa and comrel and come to nothing in the |
| 8 |
past. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
* person X commits crap (as per qa guideline) |
| 11 |
* someone Y complains (shouts at him) |
| 12 |
* person X continues to commit crap |
| 13 |
* qa leaves a marked statement |
| 14 |
* person X continues to commit crap |
| 15 |
* Y shouts more |
| 16 |
* X complains to comrel |
| 17 |
* qa asks comrel to do something |
| 18 |
* comrel is more worried about Y than about X |
| 19 |
("X is technical issue, not our business") |
| 20 |
... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
please fill in your own preference for x and y |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 26 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 28 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives