Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Daniel Butzu <dbutzu@×××××.com>
To: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A proposal to get out of this mess
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:07:12
Message-Id: 411a9f890801191507s1e845699t2e4321b6961667d6@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: A proposal to get out of this mess by Steve Long
On 1/19/08, Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:

> For the record: I'd still like drobbins involved, but I don't think his > terms were at all reasonable, and the way he went about it was > reprehensible imo. It was designed to cause the furore it did, and only > makes me give credence to the argument that much of the negative press on > distrowatch has come from an associate of his. It was a totally political > move, and not at all motivated by concern for Gentoo afaic. If he cared > that much, he'd have approached Mr Goodyear privately or on the nfp list if > he wanted to be "open". Not put everyone through all this stress. > >
Maybe. However, since it caused the furore it did it seems that a lot of users were unsatisfied. You can't stir up something when there is nothing to stir up. So maybe we should focus more on our problems today, since we were unable of doing it yesterday. -- gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: A proposal to get out of this mess Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
[gentoo-project] Re: Re: A proposal to get out of this mess Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>