| 1 |
On 02/16/11 17:50, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Currently the recruiting team handles returning developers in the same |
| 3 |
> way as people joining the first time. The question that I have been |
| 4 |
> presented with is if they should get priority? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
My opinion is that yes, they should be prioritized. They have, in the |
| 7 |
past, already shown that they do know the relevant things, and if they |
| 8 |
wish to return we should make it easy for them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> The reasoning being that |
| 11 |
> in their case it's more about making sure their skills are updated than |
| 12 |
> making sure they won't cause problems etc. Ideally of course we could |
| 13 |
> process everyone quickly enough that this wouldn't be a problem but |
| 14 |
> history has proved this to be challenging to say the least. |
| 15 |
That is another issue - recruiting is a difficult and slow process. What |
| 16 |
can we do to make it work better? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Regards, |
| 20 |
> Petteri |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist |
| 28 |
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds |
Archives