| 1 |
On Sun, 18 May 2008 12:56:49 +0200 |
| 2 |
Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:18:49AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > [..] you're locked into what's now known as GLEP 39 |
| 5 |
> > until there's a global vote to replace it with something else. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Source? I don't see anything in glep 39 that says so. So as far i |
| 8 |
> understand it glep 39 is just another glep and can be modified like |
| 9 |
> any other glep. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For the zillionth time... GLEP 39 was not a GLEP. It was one of a |
| 12 |
collection of proposals (that were not GLEPs) that were voted upon by a |
| 13 |
global vote. It was then *later* made available in GLEP form by Grant |
| 14 |
for convenience, but it wasn't accepted as a GLEP. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Unfortunately, it seems that people are misinterpreting this -- it |
| 17 |
might have been better to document it as 'The Council's Constitution' |
| 18 |
or somesuch... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives