| 1 |
On Sun, 18 May 2008 12:13:45 -0400 |
| 2 |
Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Uh - perhaps we should save our zealotry for constitutions for some |
| 4 |
> time when the Council is actually misbehaving? This really seems |
| 5 |
> like a tempest in a teapot. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If the council decided to start holding meetings in private, denied |
| 8 |
> any forum for dissent, began booting people merely for disagreeing, |
| 9 |
> and began taking the distro in a direction most devs don't like then |
| 10 |
> I'd be all for having a gentoo insurrection. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Oh, I do hope that was said with irony. Funnily enough, the Council |
| 13 |
holding meetings in private (ask them about their secret channel on |
| 14 |
oftc and their meetings with musikc), denying dissent and booting people |
| 15 |
arbitrarily is exactly what lead to them holding the second meeting |
| 16 |
that started this discussion. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives