Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [RFC] Undertakers: appeal policy
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:48:37
Message-Id: 109eea13088507d0b4dd87da6d3463e75ae07e84.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [RFC] Undertakers: appeal policy by Rich Freeman
1 On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:36 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > Our PMS is largely maintained
3 > by a former dev who many do not get along with.
4
5 This is not true. It is maintained by a few active Gentoo devs,
6 and by a quick peak last non-Gentoo-dev patch was committed in 2012.
7 In fact, EAPI 7 has been rejected in Paludis.
8
9 > Our founder isn't
10 > really involved as a dev but never wanders too far and maintains a
11 > fairly friendly fork.
12
13 'Friendly fork', right. I guess everyone is welcome to watch and make
14 his/her own opinion. However, it doesn't sound like you really have
15 verified any of those statements.
16
17 That's just to correct things. Now, guys, can we please stay on topic?
18 I welcome all your support but of the three replies so far, nobody has
19 provided any opinion on the proposal in question.
20
21 --
22 Best regards,
23 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies