| 1 |
On Tuesday, June 26, 2018 3:11:11 AM EDT Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, everyone. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Since the nominees for the new Council aren't eager to publish |
| 5 |
> manifestos, and nobody seems to be asking questions (yet some people are |
| 6 |
> leaving hostile half-comments), I'd like to start a thread dedicated to |
| 7 |
> asking the nominees (who accepted) questions related to their views of |
| 8 |
> the upcoming term. At the same time, I'd like to ask all nominees to |
| 9 |
> answer all the questions provided by community members. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I have started a more detailed page about nominees [1], and I will be |
| 12 |
> adding answers to the questions there. Please note that I will try to |
| 13 |
> summarize them to shortly fit into the table. If someone doesn't like |
| 14 |
> my summary, please let me know what to put there. That said, if someone |
| 15 |
> thinks there's another kind of useful metadata to add to the table, I'd |
| 16 |
> appreciate that as well. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> To improve readability of the thread, I'll ask my question in reply to |
| 19 |
> myself ;-). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Also, please keep the nominees in CC, in case they don't subscribe to |
| 22 |
> gentoo-project. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/Council_elections_2018 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I am not sure what your metric is for determining our eagerness to publish a |
| 27 |
manifesto or even what requirement there is to do so. In lieu of that, I |
| 28 |
actually find your idea for a public Q&A quite intriguing despite the premise. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Considering I truly like this method better, I have decided to *not* publish a |
| 31 |
manifesto as is traditionally done. Instead, I will rely on the dev community |
| 32 |
writ large to ask questions that are *important* to *them*. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-Aaron |
Archives