1 |
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 16/11/14 00:43, hasufell wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> We should recruit less people and instead make an effort to review other |
5 |
>> peoples overlays and include a list of high-quality overlays on our website. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> The good part is: any dev can do this and it moves away from our broken |
8 |
>> centralized packaging model. |
9 |
>> In addition, this will take off workload from the recruiters team. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> High-quality, reviewed overlays is a good idea. We still need more |
12 |
> recruiters though. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
++ |
16 |
|
17 |
I'm all for implementing a more distributed model, though I think it |
18 |
would take a bit more than just a list of overlays (we need better |
19 |
policies around eclass changes and the like, unless we want overlays |
20 |
to fork them). That said, we've talked about that many times and |
21 |
until we're happily buzzing along with 47 high-quality overlays let's |
22 |
not turn off the developer production factory. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Rich |