Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:31:51
Message-Id: b430f0560530102af2b13d3ef996b937ddb102a0.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions by Alec Warner
1 On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 17:35 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > I don't think committers who violate policy will be changed by a ban.
3 > Certainly not a ban that is time-delimited (it means I get a 2 week gentoo
4 > vacation!) I'd consider alternatives like:
5 > - A period where the commits need review.
6
7 Who is going to do the reviewing? Do you really believe we have
8 manpower for that? Should QA be effectively punished by a lot of extra
9 work by developers who do bad stuff?
10
11 I would like to remind we had a developer like that once, and reviewing,
12 retraining, etc. did not help at all. He just wasted a lot of time from
13 a lot of people, and removal was the only solution that actually worked.
14
15 It's easy to talk when you invent work for others to do.
16
17 --
18 Best regards,
19 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies