1 |
On 11/13/2016 07:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Foundation |
5 |
>> ======= |
6 |
>> Legal entity |
7 |
>> Deals with finance |
8 |
>> Deals with compliance |
9 |
>> Provides Infra |
10 |
>> Provides/oversees Staff |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Council |
13 |
>> ===== |
14 |
>> Fulfils aim of Linux Distribution |
15 |
>> Oversees projects |
16 |
>> Innovates and develops |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Both are Foundation and Council are elected bodies from the staff |
19 |
>> electorate. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> Anyone with any objections to this structure? |
22 |
>> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> IMO it would make more sense to limit the Foundation to things that |
25 |
> require a legal entity to provide, such as finance, IP, etc. I don't |
26 |
> think it should be running Infra or administering staff. And I'm not |
27 |
> entirely convinced that having an independent Foundation is even the |
28 |
> best way of dealing with financial issues as most other distros seem |
29 |
> to be moving away from this (if they're not run by a big corporation |
30 |
> already). If we joined SPI like Debian/Arch/Freedesktop/etc then we |
31 |
> wouldn't need to have anybody dealing with most of the details |
32 |
> finance/compliance/etc, we would just need to tell them when we need |
33 |
> bills paid and so on. That could be a special project but with a lot |
34 |
> less manpower required than what the Trustees currently have to deal |
35 |
> with. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> I'd also comment that innovation and development is the responsibility |
38 |
> of all of our contributors. I don't think that the role of a Council |
39 |
> member should be seen as some kind of prize for being the most |
40 |
> innovative/etc. Sure, they should have the general respect of the |
41 |
> community, but it is a role like any other with its own set of |
42 |
> necessary skills/etc. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Ultimately though I think it is helpful to have one group of people |
45 |
> who cast votes and decide what we ought to be doing, and one set of |
46 |
> representatives elected by this group of voters, so that we don't have |
47 |
> debates between multiple governance bodies that all believe they have |
48 |
> a mandate. |
49 |
> |
50 |
|
51 |
Outsourcing the foundation won't really solve any of the problems being |
52 |
discussed here, and adds the point of contention that (I would bet) many |
53 |
of us have to outsourcing Gentoo things, e.g. GitHub, et al. Outsourcing |
54 |
things gives outside parties influence for zero concrete contribution. |
55 |
|
56 |
I'm mostly fine with voting for Council, and your push for confirming or |
57 |
endorsing Comrel members is a step in the right direction, though we |
58 |
both know where we stand on that so I won't bother repeating myself. :) |
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
62 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
63 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |