| 1 |
On Saturday 02 November 2013 13:52:17 William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1) empty keywords (this appears to be what most people are doing) |
| 3 |
> 2) package.mask (not required, the way I see it, because of 1 and |
| 4 |
> because package.mask shouldn't be permanent) |
| 5 |
> 3) both package.mask and empty keywords (this would be double masking, |
| 6 |
> and again shouldn't be necessary) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Thoughts? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The goal is avoid to install them without any type of interactions. I guess |
| 11 |
empty keywords respect that and at the same time avoid us to write the |
| 12 |
package.mask file. |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Agostino Sarubbo |
| 15 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives