1 |
> On 3 May 2021, at 16:48, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
>> [snip] |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Seriously, if the council would send a polite and friendly request to |
6 |
> the foundation, and the trustees would outright refuse it only for |
7 |
> that formal reason, I would consider that hostile and unconstructive |
8 |
> behavior. Law doesn't come in because the trustees themselves can |
9 |
> introduce motions. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> We should try to work together. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> If some of us don't do that, we need to find a better solution for |
14 |
> Gentoo. That's why (following the ugly debates around Ian) I want a |
15 |
> single elected body to be responsible. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
That, and generally, you don’t go straight to legal solutions. |
19 |
|
20 |
I think we’re worrying about a non-problem (some hypothetical |
21 |
legal dispute(!?)). The council |
22 |
Is free to discuss what it likes. Someone has raised the issue, |
23 |
so why not? |
24 |
|
25 |
Reminder that none of us are lawyers and the council’s job |
26 |
is to debate things. Let’s not be shy about it doing that. |
27 |
|
28 |
> -- |
29 |
> Andreas K. Hüttel |
30 |
> dilfridge@g.o |
31 |
> Gentoo Linux developer |
32 |
> (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |