| 1 |
On 09/04/2018 07:47, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 9 kwietnia 2018 06:39:22 CEST, zlg <zlg@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
>> Separating concerns may work, but not without a real, legally binding |
| 4 |
>> contract that both parties consent to and abide by. Otherwise, the |
| 5 |
>> Foundation takes on all the legal and financial risk and gets nothing |
| 6 |
>> for it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> And that is what it's called not-for-profit. They volunteer to help others and want nothing in return. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+1 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
At the point a "legally binding" contract would make a difference, the |
| 13 |
project would be in serious trouble. Consider |
| 14 |
<https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/20/foss_sflc_sfc_gpl_trademark/> |
| 15 |
as an example. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paweł |
Archives