1 |
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 10:26 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: |
2 |
> On 21/02/2020 10:19, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > All things considered, maybe creating a separate 'revision' group would |
4 |
> > be better, independently of the reports. Either split ComRel in two, or |
5 |
> > appoint something independent. Let 'core' ComRel do their work, while |
6 |
> > the 'revision' group merely monitor their activities without getting |
7 |
> > directly involved in the process. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That would be a good idea in general, but shall we keep in mind that |
11 |
> comrel activity should be 0 most of the time? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't see that as really relevant here. If it wasn't clear, I meant |
15 |
that the 'revision' group would have access to all bugs and mails. Its |
16 |
main purpose would be to raise the alarm if ComRel doesn't seem to do |
17 |
their work properly. |
18 |
|
19 |
That said, I'm not claiming that this will make any real difference |
20 |
in practice. I guess it could end up in having ComRel-A with their own |
21 |
opinion vs. ComRel-B with their own opinion. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |