[gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms

[Manuel Rüger]

Dear all,

I wonder if we have some guidelines for gentoo accounts/organisations on
third-party platforms or if there is a need for it?

To start the discussion, here is a quick overview on handles, accounts
and groups on some social networks or development platforms:

* Twitter:
	* https://twitter.com/gentoo
	* https://twitter.com/GentooHardened
	* https://twitter.com/Gentoo_Security
* Facebook:
	* https://www.facebook.com/gentoo.org/
	* https://www.facebook.com/groups/linuxgentoo/
* Google+:
	* https://plus.google.com/communities/100146718762350759856
	* https://plus.google.com/+Gentoo/posts
* Dockerhub:
	* https://hub.docker.com/r/gentoo/
* Reddit:
	* https://www.reddit.com/r/Gentoo/
* LinkedIn:
	* https://www.linkedin.com/groups/36511/profile
* Github:
	* https://github.com/gentoo/
* Steam:
	* https://steamcommunity.com/groups/Gentoo
* Gitlab:
	* https://gitlab.com/gentoo
* IRC:
	* irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo

Some of those projects are run by developers, some by former developers,
others by users, who want to spread the word about Gentoo. Some are
covered by projects, some are mixed teams of devs and users, others are
not organized at all.

If those people and administrative accounts go awol, it is hard to get
access back for their successors. Oftenly it is not obvious who is or
was accountable for the handle or for actions taken on that group.

Should there be a general entity that takes care of accounts and
credentials in order ensure that Gentoo can grant and revoke access to
those representations? Does the CoC also apply on those third-party
platforms?

Some handles and groups call themselves "official" or "The official
mirror" in the case of github.
But what makes a representation "official"?
If it's run by developers? If it's covered by a entity inside gentoo
(like gentoo-pr or gentoo-ops project)? Or do we need different criterias?


Cheers,

Manuel