Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy - action plan | ||
| Date: | Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:30:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 2295481f-2fd8-9939-0bc8-2c77c470ff92@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy - action plan by Kristian Fiskerstrand |
||
| 1 | On 10/11/2016 02:28 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 | > On 10/11/2016 09:20 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 3 | >> Is the next step to propose this to council (and maybe foundation, not |
| 4 | >> sure there). |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > In terms of process, it might make sense to start a GLEP process for |
| 7 | > Comrel similar to GLEP 48 for QA. For similar definition of mandate etc |
| 8 | > I'm currently drafting a similar GLEP for Security as well, having one |
| 9 | > for comrel would align the process for special projects. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | |
| 12 | SGTM, added to my ever growing todo list :P |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy - action plan | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |