Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" <contact@×××××××××.me>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-07-21
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:53:28
Message-Id: 20190713105324.GG28475@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-07-21 by Ulrich Mueller
1 [2019-07-13 09:39:15+0200] Ulrich Mueller:
2 > >>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2019, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote:
3 >
4 > > Not sure if as a non-developer I can call for an agenda item but as it
5 > > has been in other threads by developers I think there should be a
6 > > removal of the "legal name"[1] part of GLEP-76.
7 >
8 > > It's been driving at least two active contributors away, with a least
9 > > one other person having their name outed, which is a seriously bad
10 > > flag. (I don't have the link right now to it but could find it at a
11 > > later time. And I think it would be better to not send it publicly
12 > > anyway)
13 >
14 > Contributors will need proxy committers in any case, who can then
15 > signoff the commit with their real name. This has explicitly been
16 > clarified in the meeting when GLEP 76 was accepted [1]:
17 >
18 > | - Pseudonymous / anonymous contributions would have to be proxied to
19 > | ::gentoo by a committer with real name.
20 >
21 > So, we can discuss your item, but I don't think that it raises anything
22 > new that hasn't been addressed in [2].
23
24 Oh, I wasn't aware of this decision. And I can confirm that I agree
25 with the decision taken in the meeting and so that it addresses my item.
26
27 Unfortunatetly, it doesn't looks like it was addressed and/or clarified
28 in the glep-0076.rst document by looking at the git history.[3]
29
30 > > 1: Which is very vague as depending on the jurisdiction you can quite
31 > > easily change your name either with a bit of money for the paperwork
32 > > or having testimony from people that they know you under this name.
33 >
34 > Right, but if your government issues a passport with that name, it isn't
35 > up to us to question it.
36
37 Okay, wasn't sure of the policy regarding legal names as it quite
38 depends between something you can use for administrative purposes and
39 something like a identity document like a passport.
40 So might be a good idea to clarify this one to be sure that people are
41 going to use the right one.
42
43 > Ulrich
44 >
45 > [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20180909-summary.txt
46 > [2] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20180909.txt (20:15-20:30)
47
48 [3]: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/log/glep-0076.rst