| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2018, Manuel Rüger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 14.07.2018 19:33, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I'm not sure this is an agenda item since there is really nothing |
| 5 |
>> for us to do for it in a meeting; [...] |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> In my opinion there is still a difference between implicit and |
| 8 |
> explicit agreement to a CoC, as explicit agreeement makes knowledge |
| 9 |
> about the CoC undeniable. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I agree with William here. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If this is addressed at the council, then the council has explicitly |
| 14 |
approved the CoC in its 2007-03-15 meeting [1]. Usually we don't |
| 15 |
reiterate past decisions for the sole purpose of confirming them. |
| 16 |
I also think there is no doubt that the CoC is in force. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
However, if your request is addressed at council members as |
| 19 |
individuals, then it is not an agenda item. (Of course, council |
| 20 |
members can still make a statement as requested.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20070315.txt |
Archives