| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> I am not really sure what all the fluff is about, but I simply |
| 4 |
>> asked a yes or no question. More plainly, do you really think the |
| 5 |
>> council has jurisdiction over GLEP39? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Honestly, I think my answer to that one is that it isn't really clear, |
| 8 |
> and as a result I think it is something best steered clear of. I |
| 9 |
> won't argue that it doesn't have jurisdiction, but I wouldn't act as |
| 10 |
> if it does at least as far as the Council's own role is concerned. |
| 11 |
> That's just my opinion. The Council might have a different one, and |
| 12 |
> if GLEP39 wants to post his own opinion on the matter I'm certainly |
| 13 |
> interested in it. :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In fact, the council has already clarified its opinion on the matter |
| 16 |
in a previous decision: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
* Donnie asked for a clarification by the council members on |
| 19 |
whether they think a global dev vote is required to update GLEP39 |
| 20 |
or not. The council voted 5 yes and 1 no that the council can't |
| 21 |
change GLEP39 as it requires a full developer vote. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20110715-summary.txt |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ulrich |
Archives