| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:06 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 2 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 8:54:21 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> If they go booting somebody they're not supposed to |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How do you know when such occurs? How does Infra know if they get a request |
| 8 |
> from Comrel that Comrel followed procedures or is just acting? Does Infra do |
| 9 |
> research on Comrel requests? Does the Council or anyone oversee Comrel |
| 10 |
> actions? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Currently, no, but changing that has been proposed and IMO seems |
| 14 |
likely to happen. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And if the Council told somebody that they're welcome to stay in |
| 17 |
Gentoo, and Comrel boots them anyway, I tend to suspect that most |
| 18 |
people won't just go quietly into the night. Like I said, it isn't |
| 19 |
like Comrel locks them up in a basement somewhere. They can just fire |
| 20 |
off an email to somebody on Council and things would get attention |
| 21 |
quickly. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> This entire thing is fraught with more problems than it intends to resolve and |
| 24 |
> prevent. In technology that would be crapware.... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Are you suggesting that people don't consistently follow rules as well as CPUs? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And the problems generally start off just fine on their own without |
| 29 |
any special help. I've yet to see a case where two people are getting |
| 30 |
along fine and Comrel is feeling bored and decides to pretend that |
| 31 |
they're having a dispute that they need to step in and resolve. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Rich |
Archives