| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:39 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:24 AM Tomas Mozes <hydrapolic@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> On Wednesday, August 12, 2020, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>> > Bugzilla now has connection limits per IP. I won't say what the limit |
| 9 |
>> is, but if you are crawling bugzilla or using automated tools from a single |
| 10 |
>> source IP you may hit the limit and receive 503's for requests over the |
| 11 |
>> limit. |
| 12 |
>> > This may be a particular problem for users behind things like carrier |
| 13 |
>> grade NAT (where many users are multiplexed through a single egress IP.) |
| 14 |
>> However we have seen numerous slowdowns from bot traffic and this is a |
| 15 |
>> relatively straightforward change to make on our end. If you believe you |
| 16 |
>> are being unfairly limited / blocked, please reach out to |
| 17 |
>> infra@g.o. |
| 18 |
>> > Thanks, |
| 19 |
>> > -A |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> Wouldn't 429 be more appropriate? |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The limiter doesn't support this, sorry. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -A |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Tomas |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
It also seems that bgo loads much faster. Have any changes been done in |
| 35 |
this direction too? Anyways, thanks! |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Tomas |
Archives