Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Recruitment issues and potential improvement
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:41:50
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mM3Jhn+J8NACXqS+dDpYEX74450T=tAnz4UQqwi-3t2w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Recruitment issues and potential improvement by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
2 <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:21:37 -0500
4 > Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote:
5 >> I'll start with the silliest:
6 >>
7 >> Explain briefly the purpose of the following tools: grep, cut, sed,
8 >> cat, wc, awk
9 >
10 > This is in no way silly when viewed in its proper historical context. It
11 > was added because before the quiz existed, someone recruited a couple of
12 > developers for Gentoo/Alt who didn't know what grep was, and they broke
13 > the tree in a horrific way.
14
15 This is why a big part of recruiting has to be about assessing
16 responsibility/etc.
17
18 If a developer manages to get in without understanding what grep is,
19 they should be an incredibly unproductive developer, but they
20 shouldn't break anything. That is because anybody responsible who is
21 editing an ebuild and encounters a "grep" command isn't going to touch
22 it unless they know what they're doing. They would also be testing the
23 stuff they touch before they commit it.
24
25 I'm not diminishing the importance of technical skill here. I'd just
26 take somebody who is smart enough to not commit anything over somebody
27 who thinks they're too smart to have to use care before committing
28 them any day.
29
30
31 --
32 Rich