Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Proposal to ease flames
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:16:35
Message-Id: 1186312583l.6913l.0l@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Proposal to ease flames by Steve Long
1 Steve,
3 I've in lined my words of wisdom ... you may not agree with them but
4 they are mine, after all.
6 On 2007.08.05 02:36, Steve Long wrote:
7 > I was thinking about the recent discussion re flames and firefighting
8 > on the dev m-l. One thing that occurred to me, as a user who has been
9 > on one side of those, is that it would have been better if I had
10 > never been able to post more than two posts in a day. (I mean this
11 > for the technical dev m-l, not project.)
12 That's ok as long as you only want to respond to flames and be off
13 topic. It would limit the noise a non dev can create. As soon as you
14 want to use -dev for its intended purpose, it would cramp your style.
15 This could not be usefully automated
17 >
18 > That's plenty for me to say "I think that's out of order" and to
19 > answer a response, but it also means I can't get too emotional if I
20 > get flamed by a stressed-out dev.
21 Nor can you easily take part in technical discussions, should you want
22 to :)
24 > After all, since the proctors have gone, there's no one to respond in
25 > anything like mail-list time in the (admittedly unlikely ;) event
26 > that there is another flamewar on the dev list and more cogently
27 > no-one to mute a troublesome user (in real time). A dev who is
28 > consistently anti-social (especially out of the blue when they should
29 > just ignore the thread) can be dealt with by devrel. (And have been
30 > in the past.)
31 After the fallout from the "Bubble thread" that lead directly to the
32 death of the proctors, -dev appears to have calmed down. I'm not sure
33 if that's because the proctors got so much publicity over that one
34 incident that everyone knows of it and reviewed their behavior, or if
35 they have just gone on summer holidays. I think this list will help
36 take the pressure of -dev too.
37 >
38 > If the user is making a valid point, surely others will post in
39 > support, and in any event they can respond the next day. That would
40 > minimise the chance that a user unused to the rough-and-tumble of dev
41 > behaviour would react in a hostile manner, and can in no way be seen
42 > as censorship of the user community, at least to my mind.
43 If you are making a valid technical point, your posts don't need to be
44 throttled. If not, you should not post to -dev at all.
46 >
47 > What do you think?
48 >
49 Social problems demand human in the loop control. That's why courts
50 have (skilled ?) judges for sentencing, not just a look up table of
51 offence - punishment.
53 A part of Gentoos problem and probably other OS projects, is that most
54 devs are still learning their social skills. They are school or
55 university students.
56 > --
57 > gentoo-project@g.o mailing list
58 >
60 Regards,
62 Roy Bamford
63 (NeddySeagoon)
64 --
65 gentoo-project@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Proposal to ease flames Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
[gentoo-project] Re: Proposal to ease flames Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>