1 |
On 2020-06-23 19:34, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 19:17 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
3 |
>> We haven't had a new EAPI in a while. I hope it stays that way, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Are you saying you're against fixing bugs in the current EAPI and would |
6 |
> prefer ignoring the problems that have been identified so far? |
7 |
|
8 |
Have you stopped punching yourself? |
9 |
|
10 |
Nice false dichotomy you've set up, let me instead talk about something |
11 |
unrelated ... |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> and we |
14 |
>> might even reduce the amount of active EAPIs even more so that there's |
15 |
>> fewer surprises |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Are you going to achieve that by committing more ebuilds using |
18 |
> deprecated EAPIs? |
19 |
> |
20 |
Ah damn it must feel good to yell at people. |
21 |
|
22 |
I know what you mean, you know what you mean, everyone else is most |
23 |
likely confused. |
24 |
|
25 |
... do you think this is a good use of time of the readers of this |
26 |
mailinglist? |
27 |
|
28 |
May I suggest that you keep your personal grievances to yourself and |
29 |
possibly, maybe, not bother other people with it? But that's too much to |
30 |
ask, and you REALLY like to attack me personally. (Like, I write two |
31 |
emails and BAM there's a gorny trying to throw shade ... which is why |
32 |
I've mostly abstained from mailinglists for a while. Too predictable and |
33 |
no useful results) |
34 |
|
35 |
So to get back to your first question, if there are useful changes then |
36 |
of course we can discuss them. From my point of view that's fixing the |
37 |
wrong things (the ebuild format in itself is ... hmm ... not very |
38 |
optimal). And we've backdated changes into existing EAPIs, so if it's |
39 |
"just" a bug the specification could be ammended and problem solve. |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
To get back to the issue of personal attacks, I don't particularly enjoy |
43 |
your brand of negativity, and would appreciate it if you didn't spray it |
44 |
around like a male cat. I doubt you'll even understand this, as you've |
45 |
carefully managed to skip any criticism before. |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
Oh well, didn't have a proper flamewar in a while. Not going to have |
49 |
one. Sad. |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
Be excellent to each other, |
53 |
|
54 |
Patrick |