1 |
On 09/14/2017 11:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 23∶45 -0700, użytkownik Daniel |
3 |
> Campbell napisał: |
4 |
>> On 09/14/2017 11:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
>>> W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶58 -0700, użytkownik Daniel |
6 |
>>> Campbell napisał: |
7 |
>>>> If I had to find a nitpick, it's a minor feature request: can we get a |
8 |
>>>> GLEP template file later on, to aid the initial drafting process? I |
9 |
>>>> didn't see it in the repo. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> I see your point. I always took some random late GLEP and wiped out |
12 |
>>> the contents. Maybe having a skel file with just the headings and empty |
13 |
>>> headers wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> I'm wondering if it belongs in the GLEP repo though. Maybe just |
16 |
>>> skel.rst? (given that www globs on glep-[0-9]...) |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> skel.rst would work I think; any file name that didn't disrupt |
20 |
>> automation would be good enough, though. No real preference. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> OTOH, I think we'll start by adding it to gentoo syntax packages for our |
24 |
> editors, so e.g. typing: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> $ vim glep-0100.rst |
27 |
> |
28 |
> you'd get the skel in place. I guess we'll see how good coverage that |
29 |
> has, and then decide if we need another skel in the repo. |
30 |
> |
31 |
Now that you mention it, putting it into syntax packages seems cleaner |
32 |
and editors could get automatic support. *And* this repository doesn't |
33 |
have to be touched... |
34 |
|
35 |
Maybe we have a winner? :p |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer, Trustee, Treasurer |
39 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
40 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |