| 1 |
On 1/4/2017 2:47 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/04/2017 06:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>> With increasing focus on security in various contexts I'd like to |
| 4 |
>> propose that we start discussing catching up with other distributions |
| 5 |
>> and start requiring new developers' OpenPGP keyblocks to have at least |
| 6 |
>> two signatures from existing developers before applications can be |
| 7 |
>> made[A]. Amongst other things This helps building the Gentoo Web of Trust. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Since the qa-report one is down, this is the current Gentoo WoT: |
| 11 |
> https://download.sumptuouscapital.com/gentoo/gentoo-devs.png |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What this doesn't show are the developers (including me) who have no |
| 15 |
signatures or none relating to Gentoo. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Besides Gentoo, I have little to no interaction with anyone who even |
| 18 |
knows what GPG even is. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't agree with making this a requirement or even having another hoop |
| 21 |
to jump through for those who cannot travel. Not everyone has the |
| 22 |
luxury of going from place to place. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Brian |
Archives
