1 |
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 09:31 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 11:15 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 03 May 2021, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > > On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > The way I see it is, if the council wants funding for something |
8 |
> > > > > they |
9 |
> > > > > can request it from the foundation, but I don't think they can |
10 |
> > > > > direct |
11 |
> > > > > the foundation not to fund something someone else requests. |
12 |
> > > > > |
13 |
> > > > > Also, given Antarus' response in the thread, I'm not sure there is |
14 |
> > > > > anything for council to discuss. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > > Does 'being not sure' authorize you to arbitrarily decide to skip |
17 |
> > > > agenda items from the community? |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > I don't read William's reponse in such a way. The Council can still |
20 |
> > > discuss the issue, and the Foundation may or may not listen. |
21 |
> > > |
22 |
> > > Ultimately it is up to them how they want to spend their money. |
23 |
> > > I believe that part is clear. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > However the response is to be read, there's no item for this |
26 |
> > in the agenda. So it's pretty much a single Council member individually |
27 |
> > deciding what Council discusses or not. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> You know that in the past some things that have come up on the call for agenda |
30 |
> items thread have not ended up on the agenda. |
31 |
|
32 |
Past violations are not an excuse. |
33 |
|
34 |
> As was already said, any discussion we do around this doesn't really |
35 |
> matter since we do not control financial issues for the distro. |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
With that attitude you may as well say that devs don't have to listen to |
39 |
the Council and disband it altogether. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Best regards, |
43 |
Michał Górny |