| 1 |
[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or un-expected send a response and request a signed confirmation] |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 29 Mar 2017, at 09:56, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> How would you feel about removing/disabling the UPSTREAM resolution, |
| 6 |
> and expecting developers to use UPSTREAM keyword + regular resolution? |
| 7 |
> Any other ideas? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Upstream keyword doesn't seem relevant as it implies having submitted patch or at least filed bug upstream, so the real question is whether we need a separation of something that is out of scope for Gentoo and can be referred upstream or not. The way I see it, directly using RESOLVED INVALID is likely as good an explaination as RESOLVED UPSTREAM unless we want to monitor stats for rejection reasons. |
Archives