Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo conflicts and leadership
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 09:12:10
Message-Id: 6174d4fe-d921-a961-583d-2a035aa4e4a4@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo conflicts and leadership by Rich Freeman
1 On 01/05/2017 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > What could a "Chief Architect" do besides just pick one winner and
3 > have everybody else go elsewhere?
4
5 Isn't that a bit of a false dichotomy? You're implying that a single
6 architect couldn't come to the same conclusion as a committee. A BDFL
7 could easily decide that choice is important and ask developers to keep
8 that in mind going forward... pretty much exactly as the Council has done.
9
10 The 'B' part of BDFL is important.
11 --
12 Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
13 OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
14 fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo conflicts and leadership "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo conflicts and leadership "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>