| 1 |
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:04:21 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > How many times does it need be said that nothing |
| 6 |
> > regarding Gentoo should be confidential. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Evidently, once more. I've stated the reasons I disagree. That's |
| 9 |
> fine, we're allowed to disagree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Here run this software, and no matter how it may effect you. You cannot see |
| 12 |
how the software does its thing.... It is closed source! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That is exactly what you are saying you support. Actions being taken that |
| 15 |
effect Gentoo community and distribution. Yet you advocate keeping that |
| 16 |
process, and data secret. Making everyone subject to the outcome. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Open source project with closed processes. That is complete insane thinking |
| 19 |
for leadership of an open source project! Seriously step back and think about |
| 20 |
that a bit. There is no difference between closed source software and what |
| 21 |
you are supporting. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Not meaning offensively, just take it logically. Is there any difference? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives