Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Does the council need a lead?
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:07:21
Message-Id: n2s8b4c83ad1004180607g89f90f79pade03e4c9f9052d0@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Does the council need a lead? by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 04/18/2010 03:45 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
3 >> Didn't we have a secretary in charge of agendas once? And well,
4 >> chairing of meetings could simply be rotated amongst the council
5 >> members.
6 >>
7 >
8 > The person in charge can still delegate to a secretary. The point is he
9 > would make sure to remind and replace him if the secretary goes MIA.
10 >
11
12 Alright. So if the distinction is purely administrative, and has
13 nothing to do with new powers; there should be no need for a separate
14 election for the lead. The council members should elect one amongst
15 themselves (or rotate, or whatever).
16
17
18 --
19 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
20
21 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team