1 |
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:01:19AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> Have I missed your posting the results of this? Especially, what is |
3 |
> the preferred ordering of ChangeLog entries? |
4 |
|
5 |
I just hadn't finished putting the results into a long-term format quite |
6 |
yet, but did so this afternoon: |
7 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/201602-portage-survey/ |
8 |
|
9 |
I have included a CSV of the public answers, excludes only the last |
10 |
question about contact info. |
11 |
|
12 |
Some remarks about question #2 and #3: |
13 |
|
14 |
Q2: Reduce local disk usage by excluding ChangeLogs? |
15 |
---------------------------------------------------- |
16 |
It was unfortunately pointed out to me very late that my question #2 had |
17 |
some confusing text: |
18 |
- "No, but only if were optional (I do NOT want it, but others might)" |
19 |
- "Yes, but only if it were optional (I want it, but others might NOT)" |
20 |
|
21 |
The bracket portion of each answer was interpreted as meaning the |
22 |
opposite as the start of each answer :-(. |
23 |
|
24 |
Either way, ~60% are in favour of getting rid of changelogs. |
25 |
|
26 |
IMO this is a BETTER goal than continuing to generate them for rsync, |
27 |
and bike-shedding about what the order should be; and it provides a huge |
28 |
benefit by reducing the size of rsync by 155MiB. |
29 |
|
30 |
Q3: What order should ChangeLog entries be in? |
31 |
---------------------------------------------- |
32 |
- 85.3% of responses either preferred newest first OR didn't care (incl |
33 |
so as long as the tools work). |
34 |
- 2.9% wanted oldest first. |
35 |
- NOBODY selected "I'd prefer oldest entries first, but do what is best |
36 |
for distribution" |
37 |
- 11.8% said get rid of changelogs. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
41 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee |
42 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
43 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |