| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> No, it does not concern a single package only. This is about making |
| 4 |
> a clear policy. There are more examples of packages with broken |
| 5 |
> useflags such as app-editors/nano[debug] or other "vanilla" useflags |
| 6 |
> for glibc and so on which are all in STABLE branch. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> This was already discussed in #gentoo-qa and it seems there is no |
| 9 |
> clear consensus about the issue. That's where the council has to |
| 10 |
> make a call. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As I said, get a resolution from QA first, before escalating to the |
| 13 |
council. The procedure for this is clearly outlined in GLEP 48. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ulrich |
Archives