1 |
On 31/03/2018 21:06, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
> Otherwise Gentoo development can become very insular, in-grown and |
3 |
> detached from reality. This actually allows for a situation to exist |
4 |
> where there is a lot of internal drama, debate and angst between |
5 |
> developers as there is no clear focus for the project and it becomes |
6 |
> difficult to assess what to focus on. |
7 |
|
8 |
I share this concern 100% . |
9 |
|
10 |
> While you may view user representation as a threat to Gentoo |
11 |
> development efforts, when done right it is actually going to be a |
12 |
> refreshing change that brings a new calmness and focus to the |
13 |
> project and also provides a much-needed positive feedback loop. |
14 |
|
15 |
My impression of others' reactions isn't much that it's a threat, just |
16 |
doubting if (as currently proposed) it'd be effective. |
17 |
|
18 |
I hope this thread can lead to improvements to Gentoo. I don't think you |
19 |
can continue to push your initial idea without applying the IMO |
20 |
reasonable feedback from the community. |
21 |
|
22 |
> Assuming no existing devs want to work on areas of user interest, at |
23 |
> least we will be tracking areas that users would like us to work on, |
24 |
> and new devs can be recruited who want to work on these areas. |
25 |
|
26 |
I don't think anyone would be opposed to that. Did you consider leading |
27 |
such a project? |
28 |
|
29 |
Paweł |