1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Libraries don't have to be sad. If the history remains in a CVS |
4 |
> repo isn't that the perfect home for it in the museum of gentoo's |
5 |
> history? |
6 |
|
7 |
Having the complete history in a single repository would be much |
8 |
preferable, even if that history is not perfect. |
9 |
|
10 |
It's annoying if you search for the point when some change was |
11 |
performed, only to find that the repo's history doesn't reach back |
12 |
that far. I've had this issue e.g. with the Portage repository whose |
13 |
history was cut off at some point. Having to change tools (from git to |
14 |
cvs) in addition doesn't make it better. |
15 |
|
16 |
Ulrich |