| 1 |
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:59:12 PM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:58:42 PM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Well, if you have a problem with how Comrel is handling your case |
| 7 |
> >> today, I suggest you appeal it. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Appeal what? Comrel entirely? What would I be appealing? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The facts of your case. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What is my case? That comrel gets involved in recruiting and prevents my |
| 14 |
return? Appeal the status/label comrel has given me? Appeal the notes comrel |
| 15 |
has on me? What is my status I would be appealing? What is the decision I am |
| 16 |
appealing? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What would I be appealing? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> If your problem is with how Comrel operates in general, then stop |
| 21 |
> bringing up your own case because it simply isn't relevant. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
How is my case not relevant to how comrel operates? If anything I am a good |
| 24 |
case example of comrel's inability to resolve a matter. You know the saying, |
| 25 |
lead by example... I am the example... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> If your |
| 28 |
> problem is with the handling of your case then appeal it, because |
| 29 |
> nobody on this list can help you. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Appeal what? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> The lists are best used for discussing specific proposed reforms or |
| 34 |
> problems. The sort of problem that can be discussed on a list and be |
| 35 |
> likely to lead to improvements is "the documentation isn't clear on |
| 36 |
> how I file an appeal." The sort of problem that isn't likely to get |
| 37 |
> resolved on a list is "I filed an appeal and didn't get the answer I |
| 38 |
> wanted." |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
It is not the documentation or process, but the topic. What am I appealing? |
| 41 |
What comrel action am I appealing? |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives