1 |
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> W dniu wto, 02.01.2018 o godzinie 14∶35 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller |
4 |
> napisał: |
5 |
> > In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time |
6 |
> > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda |
7 |
> > to discuss or vote on. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to |
10 |
> > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
11 |
> > suggested one (since the last meeting). |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-01-07. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Please reply to the gentoo-project list. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'd like to ask Council what to do about arches without arch teams. |
19 |
> In particular, I'm talking about the architectures whose partial support |
20 |
> vapier had been committing haphazardly and that do not have |
21 |
> corresponding projects or aliases, that is: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> nios2 |
24 |
> riscv |
25 |
> |
26 |
> This means that developers only see the keywords randomly appearing |
27 |
> in their packages but neither developers nor users have any way to |
28 |
> properly contact the arch team (because it doesn't exist!). |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
> That said, I'd like to propose an official policy that no new arches can |
32 |
> be added without being assigned to a specific project (arch team). |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
In general should we require people to prove a more solid base in an |
36 |
overlay; before admitting new arches into the main tree[1]? |
37 |
|
38 |
[1] My goal is to have a smaller main tree, so I am biased here a bit ;) |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
> -- |
43 |
> Best regards, |
44 |
> Michał Górny |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |