| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> From what I've seen, a common approach to conflict resolution is via the |
| 3 |
> bug-tracker, or e-mails to comrel. These create 'paper trails' for us, |
| 4 |
> so I don't think that's much of a problem in terms of discovery. The |
| 5 |
> Trustees could suggest that official channels be used before petitioning |
| 6 |
> them for a decision on Foundation membership. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
You mean something like a "background check"? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, that might at least prevent that someone becomes foundation member "for |
| 11 |
contributions to gentoo" while being banned by comrel on gentoo infrastructure |
| 12 |
"for continous misbehaviour". (Yep that happened in the past.) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 16 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 18 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives