1 |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:17:43PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> Bottom line is that I'd especially encourage anybody who is in a role |
3 |
> like an officer/trustee to just be careful about the language we use. |
4 |
> Sometimes I've seen in private conversation statements like "we're |
5 |
> technically violating the law" and such - I understand the spirit (we |
6 |
> DO want to follow the law), but statements like this said with the |
7 |
> best of intentions can end up being used against us. We can just as |
8 |
> seriously consider the matter while saying things like "it is possible |
9 |
> that a court might think that this is in violation of the law" and |
10 |
> being clear that our speculation/opinion is just that. |
11 |
Thanks for the reminder. |
12 |
|
13 |
As one of the people on the licenses@ alias that often gives advice and |
14 |
helps make decisions, I try to always include IANAL, but this should go |
15 |
doubly for any postings we make to the list. |
16 |
|
17 |
Of course, if somebody on the list DOES happen to be a lawyer, then |
18 |
they don't need to use IANAL, and we have had developers in the past |
19 |
that were actually lawyers. |
20 |
|
21 |
If there are more lawyers lurking on this list, and are interested in |
22 |
licensing issues [1], I encourage you to join the list and help us work |
23 |
on issues as they are raised. |
24 |
|
25 |
[1] I do fully understand that you might want to get away from "work", |
26 |
and just be coding instead of doing anything like your dayjob. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
30 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead |
31 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
32 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |